The savings deposits rate remained at 3.5% since 1 March 2003 for more than eight years till early this month when RBI revised it to 4%. Given the level of inflation depositors are getting negative returns. RBI has recently circulated a discussion paper on deregulation of savings deposit rate.
As per the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) directive the chief executives of foreign banks operating in India will be responsible for local regulatory, statutory and audit compliance.
The RBI raised required loan provisioning. Restructured loans are now provisioned at 2%, up from 0.25%-1%; loans classified substandard are now 15%, up from 10%; secured loans classified as doubtful for more than a year are now 25%, up from 20%; and loans classified as doubtful for one to three years are now 40%, up from 30%. These higher credit costs will reduce bank earnings this fiscal year, but enable banks to enhance their buffers against potential loan losses. Importantly, higher interest rates will negatively impact borrowers' debt-servicing abilities, and may further result in a deterioration in asset quality.
Real estate firms are turning towards Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs). Most banks have shut their doors on this sector.
RBI has decided to do away with priority sector lending status for bank loans to NBFCs. With 90 per cent of commercial vehicle sales financed by NBFCs, the move by the RBI is expected to hurt the small road transport operators as it would be tough for them to access finance, which will also become more expensive.
Showing posts with label Banking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Banking. Show all posts
Friday, June 17, 2011
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Swiss Bank Account
We call it by many names. Gh’aban, ghotala… Indians are well aware of scams by politicians, bureaucrats and business houses. Scams are not only prevalent in our country but also traced in Japan, US and other advanced countries. We are also aware about the destinations of this moola. Swiss banks are the place where scams-ters put their hard earned money (with blood of the poor victims). These banks provide private banking services to ultra-rich clients. Complete secrecy is maintained. No government or any party on this earth can get accounts’ information from these wealth managers.
No one has idea about the number of netas, babus and banias who hold secret accounts in the banks of Switzerland and no clue about the money locked in. Recently the tax authorities in US have encountered tax-evasion and investment of laundered money in UBS AG and Credit Suisse. Switzerland’s bank secrecy laws have come under increasing scrutiny in many countries. This issue has even caught the limelight in the summit of G-20 countries. Lichtenstein and Monaco are other tax havens.
The International Money Laundering Information Network states, “Serious efforts have been, and continue to be, made to create greater transparency in financial matters, but the offshore financial world remains for a large part a ‘Bermuda triangle’ for financial investigations.”
The supporters of bank-secrecy say that this is a legal contract between two parties for ‘not to reveal’ anything. But those against this concept are of the view that ‘funds being misused to commit terrorism, money laundering, tax evasion, or other misconduct.’ UBS has turned over the names of nearly 300 clients who owned the Swiss accounts. International news agency AFP is reporting that UBS rejected a new U.S. government lawsuit filed late last week asking that the bank disclose the identities of some 52,000 U.S. customers who allegedly evaded taxes. The U.S. government estimates approximately $14.8 billion is hidden in the Swiss accounts.
Any way this is a matter of shame that when millions of people are losing their jobs due to economic crisis, some richest of the rich are not fulfilling their civil and legal responsibilities of paying taxes. Thanks to “bank secrecy” poor are not getting loaf of bread. Few banks have suggested their executives not to travel abroad to avoid arrests by the authorities of host countries. A fresh report reveals that ‘Switzerland agreed to loosen bank secrecy for foreign clients.’ The wheel has started rolling in the right direction. We can now hope for a transparent banking system. Furthermore this will only create more “white money” and reduce some of the “black money”.
The International Money Laundering Information Network states, “Serious efforts have been, and continue to be, made to create greater transparency in financial matters, but the offshore financial world remains for a large part a ‘Bermuda triangle’ for financial investigations.”
The supporters of bank-secrecy say that this is a legal contract between two parties for ‘not to reveal’ anything. But those against this concept are of the view that ‘funds being misused to commit terrorism, money laundering, tax evasion, or other misconduct.’ UBS has turned over the names of nearly 300 clients who owned the Swiss accounts. International news agency AFP is reporting that UBS rejected a new U.S. government lawsuit filed late last week asking that the bank disclose the identities of some 52,000 U.S. customers who allegedly evaded taxes. The U.S. government estimates approximately $14.8 billion is hidden in the Swiss accounts.
Any way this is a matter of shame that when millions of people are losing their jobs due to economic crisis, some richest of the rich are not fulfilling their civil and legal responsibilities of paying taxes. Thanks to “bank secrecy” poor are not getting loaf of bread. Few banks have suggested their executives not to travel abroad to avoid arrests by the authorities of host countries. A fresh report reveals that ‘Switzerland agreed to loosen bank secrecy for foreign clients.’ The wheel has started rolling in the right direction. We can now hope for a transparent banking system. Furthermore this will only create more “white money” and reduce some of the “black money”.
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
Come on, Nationalize!
The nationalization debate has started. The governments in US and UK are pumping rescue funds or bailout money in the financial giants for almost a year now. AIG, Citi, BofA, RBS etc. have been provided with billions of dollars from the taxpayers’ money. Still the mount of capitalism is shy of using the term “nationalization”. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and FDIC chief Sheila Bair call this concept a non-sense.
Nationalization, at this stage, is almost necessitated in order to prevent further collapse of the financial institutions. Depository institutions are the life-blood of a nation’s trade and well-being, and cannot be allowed to play roulette with the citizens’ money. Nouriel Roubini, a well-respected economist has been pushing the nationalization idea for several weeks now. Roubini proposes that the government nationalize all the banks that are deemed insolvent as per the Treasury’s ‘stress-test’, and quickly separate the acquired assets into good and bad for easy disposal.
Indira Gandhi’s government nationalized all 14 of India’s largest banks in one fell swoop in 1969. In a second act, the government nationalized the six next largest banks back in 1980. Today, out of the 88 commercial banks in India, 27 (the largest, including State Bank) have the Indian Government as the largest shareholder. To put in perspective, 75% of the country’s banking assets are in the hands of our trusted government. Also to note is that the Reserve Bank of India, the counterpart of the US Fed is completely nationalized, unlike the Fed which is a quasi-autonomous entity with sometimes squeamish objectives.
Free markets only work when they can self-regulate effectively, which is somewhat ironical given that they only exist because of individuals’ greed. Nationalization is a need of the hour. Be rational in taking decisions and making comments.
Nationalization, at this stage, is almost necessitated in order to prevent further collapse of the financial institutions. Depository institutions are the life-blood of a nation’s trade and well-being, and cannot be allowed to play roulette with the citizens’ money. Nouriel Roubini, a well-respected economist has been pushing the nationalization idea for several weeks now. Roubini proposes that the government nationalize all the banks that are deemed insolvent as per the Treasury’s ‘stress-test’, and quickly separate the acquired assets into good and bad for easy disposal.
Indira Gandhi’s government nationalized all 14 of India’s largest banks in one fell swoop in 1969. In a second act, the government nationalized the six next largest banks back in 1980. Today, out of the 88 commercial banks in India, 27 (the largest, including State Bank) have the Indian Government as the largest shareholder. To put in perspective, 75% of the country’s banking assets are in the hands of our trusted government. Also to note is that the Reserve Bank of India, the counterpart of the US Fed is completely nationalized, unlike the Fed which is a quasi-autonomous entity with sometimes squeamish objectives.
Free markets only work when they can self-regulate effectively, which is somewhat ironical given that they only exist because of individuals’ greed. Nationalization is a need of the hour. Be rational in taking decisions and making comments.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)